Today marks my 5 year anniversary on Twitter. Half a decade of tweets, and much has changed. The early days of Twitter were amazing: it was like getting invited to a dinner party of the coolest people in tech. Then the masses showed up (I blame @aplusk).
Facebook has gone through the same pattern. I’ve spoken to Harvard grads who were the first users of “The Facebook” and heard their stories of “it’s not as good as it used to be”.
Michael Arrington has a recent blog post about Facebook that echos that sentiment:
Nobody Goes To Facebook Anymore. It’s Too Crowded.
Anyhow, Facebook today is so crowded and messy that no one ever goes there anymore. Or at least that’s what I imagine Yogi Berra would say.
So Facebook, I ask you. Give us the Steven Levy do-over. Or give it a Jack Welch twist and auto suggest we unfriend the 10% of our Facebook friends that we interact with the least once a year. Or both.
I promise, cross my heart and pinky swear, I’ll be more restrained and focused this time. I’ll realize the long term consequences of my more hasty why the hell not click yes decisions, and I won’t repeat my past sin of not saying “no” more often.
Ok, I may repeat past sins. But you can just let me start fresh again next year, right? That wouldn’t be so bad. I could live with that.
Then there is G+, where it looks like history is once again repeating itself, according to Jon Mitchell at RWW:
Thanks to the Scoble effect, I have 8,000 encirclements on Google+. It creeps me out, because I don’t know why I’m encircled by all these people, and I don’t really get what they’re talking about most of the time. Since I presume it’s because I’m a tech blogger, I am waiting impatiently for the day I can migrate this whole thing over to my RWW Google Apps account and just let Google+ be a work thing.
Google is great for work. Gmail and Google Docs are nice things. Hangout meetings are fun. My work personality is much more measured, flat and bland than my real self, and Google tools are great for expressing that.
Now on the horizon, new networks where we are promised the same cool dinner party feel we loved in the beginning. Path is the current flavor of the month. Let’s see how long that lasts…
Hunter Walk’s blog, Elapsed Time highlights the four reasons that we continue to mess up all our social networking sites:
1) Vanity & Ego
Hunter’s rule: Any communication service which publicly displays a metric serving as a proxy for popularity will cause users to take steps to increase that number. Number of friends on Facebook, number of connections on LinkedIn are two easy examples.
2) Boredom & Pleasure
You fire up Path/Instagram/Facebook/Twitter/whatever and, gasp, there aren’t any new updates from friends. Hmm, that was unrewarding, so you decide to friend some more folks to decrease the chances of shooting blanks. It’s equivalent to random reward cycles in game design - each time you log-in there might be a prize, and it keeps you coming back.
3) Reciprocation & Conflict Avoidance
C’mon, admit it, you’ve followed someone just because they followed you first. And you’re afraid to unfriend/unfollow because you don’t want to have THAT conversation with them. These issues are most prevalent in bidirectional systems such as Facebook but most services have this issue - I’m guilty a few times of DM’ing someone who then reminds me they can’t DM me back because I DON’T FOLLOW THEM. Sheepish “oops.”
4) I Like You But Not Everything About You
Social graph != interest graph. So I friend someone but eventually see noise from them - where noise is defined as “jeez, you really like to post dog photos.” If it’s a particular data source you can block it at the app level (no more castleville invites!) but when it’s just generic media types, you can’t block.
Check out his blog to see his solutions to these problems.
As for me, I’m happy to keep you all for another 5 years.